PeterGriffin: no foul

PeterGriffin in the thread, michelle obama: pushes the poetry of thugs,

So basically, its “ZOMG another one of *those people* is going to the White House”, and we have to use “thug” and other code words because we can’t just come right out and say “******”.

The complaint in the TTTM, Peter Griffin-major racially loaded post, extremely offensive,

Nothing personal against PG, just pointing this out. Sounds like he’s calling a whole bunch of Hannity forum conservatives racist. And maybe it’s a coincidence, but note the number of characters in the word that was filtered out.

This has been reduced to a complaint about using filterable words.  DaGooseMon’s ruling:

No foul. The filter did what the filter is supposed to do.

A post was deleted which readdressed the OP’s main point: the accusation which PeterGriffin made against those such as Sean Hannity who objected to Common’s invitation to the White House.


About white rabbit

Through the looking glass.
This entry was posted in Crimes & Misdemeanors. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to PeterGriffin: no foul

  1. ahelluvalady says:

    Goose has no problem with a member using the “N word”?? LOL.
    Oh wait, PG is a lib, k, now I get it….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s